chart...i believe you lack facts and context relative to this comment. though this cretin of a sharade continues to represent that I blame him for my position, rest assured his "race to the bottom" commentary actively encouraged here, while cute and appealing to some,i do not, not have i ever suggested such a relationship.
i've held their paper(a painful 24+ months and counting), on the belief they can and would deliver. i am not a trader, nor am i projecting my very speculative choice on anyone else.
in my commentary, I am neither a basher nor pumper. i share both sides as i see them. bottomline, while not looking very good, the jury is still out on these guys (who i believe to be over their heads) and perhaps only a rescue package from some other competent suitor will salvage their prospects, imo.
yet, my point with cretin TS, is while serving as the prinicpal moderator, (in the opinions of some) he authored continuous and often lofty opinions about the bullish natuer of the company's prospects WHILE AT THE SAME TIME (perhaps) DUMPING 200 MILLIONS SHARES onto the very bagholders he was, in part, complicit in creating.
you can do as you see fit with your positions in private. however, if you are a primary moderator of a stock board, you might assume a slightly higher standard of behavior would be expected of you when compared to average board poster.
it's kinda like ihub knowningly sanctioning paid pumpers to serve as moderators on the board, sans full disclosure, and saying "is their a problem?". not saying that scenario applies to this cretin, just that he was the mod and yet seemed to be selling into the very excitement to wit he was a principal choreograher.
may not be per se illegal, nor a TOU violation. but in principle it does not sit well with mois.
so, net/net, the only person i blame for my failed (to date) choice is me. not douchebag, nor anyone else. the burden of performance rests squarely on the tone deaf and brain dead management team. yet, perhaps they will pull a rabbit out of a hat?
AI
