![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:41:00 AM
While 141's license is perpetual, this will not be the case for other SWARM licensing contracts, in which license fees will be major parts of the sustained revenue stream. However, with the 141 deal, I believe the licensing fee will eventually become insignificant relative to the other revenues from skimming and increased 141 share price.
With regard to the o/s for 141, my information came from this board, particularly Allie's estimate of 40% ownership based on her conversations with management. Since she read my post and did not object, I feel this is okay for the time being. However, I definitely left this a variable on my spreadsheet;)
Thanks for your feedback. I appreciate the education I'm getting around here.
God grant me the serenity to deal with the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can and should; and wisdom to know the difference.
Recent SPZI News
- Real Estate Purchase Sending Shares Higher in Heavy Trade • AllPennyStocks.com • 07/18/2024 04:34:00 PM
FEATURED Mawson Finland Provides Update on Exploration Activities at Rajapalot • Aug 21, 2024 9:06 AM
Unitronix Announces Strategic Entry into Cryptocurrency Space • UTRX • Aug 21, 2024 10:00 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement Robust Cybersecurity Measures for AI-Driven Healthcare Solutions • AVAI • Aug 21, 2024 8:00 AM
HealthLynked Corp. Announces Second Quarter and First Half 2024 Results: Continued Cost Reductions Set the Stage for Strategic Shift to App-Based Technology Services • HLYK • Aug 16, 2024 8:00 AM
PickleJar Announces Official Name Change and New Ticker Symbol • NREG • Aug 15, 2024 2:23 PM
VAYK's Q2 Profit Added to Accumulated Net Profit of Over $2.2 Million In 18 Months • VAYK • Aug 15, 2024 9:07 AM