SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[Gbathat]

Thanks Snow. I did consider these thoughts initially. It may be technically incorrect to include the 1.5 mil as sustained revenue, but for my own personal valuation, I decided it would be good to include the 1.5 million as it will recur in other forms in the future.

While 141's license is perpetual, this will not be the case for other SWARM licensing contracts, in which license fees will be major parts of the sustained revenue stream. However, with the 141 deal, I believe the licensing fee will eventually become insignificant relative to the other revenues from skimming and increased 141 share price.

With regard to the o/s for 141, my information came from this board, particularly Allie's estimate of 40% ownership based on her conversations with management. Since she read my post and did not object, I feel this is okay for the time being. However, I definitely left this a variable on my spreadsheet;)

Thanks for your feedback. I appreciate the education I'm getting around here.