SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[Ineedmoreshares]

Stop making unsupported evil assumptions.

"My main objection to your calculation is that I assume the license fee is not recurring. You cannot reasonably base a p/e ratio on non-recurring revenue. If it is recurring I have no major objection to your calculation."

You have nothing, nada, zilch to support your assumption that the license fee is not recurring.

But maybe it isn't, still you fail to point out that the license will END. 141 is test driving SWARM. [And that means its debut has a higher chance of success than with any other trader.]

That test period, by virtue of it being set by a license, must, according to law, have a set period for the license to end.

The more fair ASSUMPTION is that the fee won't be recurring because the license will come to an end and any future license may be renegotiated. But you're not interested in playing fair.

All you do is assume evil when all of the evidence points to this 141 deal being a huge bonus for SPZI.