InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 474
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/11/2007

Re: Gbathat post# 30713

Saturday, 09/29/2007 11:10:24 AM

Saturday, September 29, 2007 11:10:24 AM

Post# of 87066
Great post Gab,

Very conservative analysis which shows a nice doubling of SPZI pps... and that's just based on one single deal for one part of the SPOOZ product line and that's a license which will expire one day. And it's only a license for one sector of the market.

Hasn't anybody else realized that by having 141/Paul take SWARM out to publicly test drive SWARM for profits we are in such a stronger position to have it become a phenomenon.

Imagine if Paul had licensed it to somebody else for more money, but that entity didn't use it as well as Paul will. The first results on this software will be the most important. It needs to make money coming out of the gate. With Paul in the driver's seat, the chances of it being a fast success are much stronger.

When Paul has teased the market place, when the exclusive license runs out, they will be lined up a mile long to get on SWARM. Think long term on this play. If this works out, who will be able to trade without it?

Maybe I've missed something and I am prone to dreaming. But might we be sitting on something here which is potentially MASSIVE?

If SWARM and ST work as well as we think they work, how will traders go without this stuff? And people are worried about the first license? C'mon, sometimes the big picture doesn't pan out. But if this one does, man are we in for a trip.

Pinks are by nature, not safe. So I consider all Pinks a risk, but I also play poker and I know that I have to get my chips all in when I "think" I've got the best of it. Sometimes Aces get cracked. That's life. But they win alot more than they lose.

[Thanks for all the good vibes from the board. I can't PM so sorry if I dont get back to you tat way.]