SHORTCHANGE: THAT IS AN AWFUL LOT OF 'BREAD' ($500,000) to put in a pink sheet. Am I reading you correctly? If you put that in, and are only losing less than $10,000 you could count yourself lucky.
I can understand your feelings. Tell me, your 'user name', did you pick that before 'investing' in this company, or after? If before, it could be a form of Freudian slip, premonition, or financial death wish.
Sorry for that. Hope you can still manage to see 'the bright (and funny) side of life' (Monty Python Brit humour)
When we lose the habit of being able to laugh at our errors, then we really do have a problem.
However, all may not yet be lost as I have set out in some recent posts, and in the one I am posting after this.
As for a 'criminal' case against the company, the only word I know for sure they have gone back on, so far, is when in a PR (and remember these are always covered by cautionary statements) Brazzano issued a PR to indicate they were not planning a R/S and then shortly afterwards, they did.
All the other claims were not backed by any forcible time limit.
Until a new website sets out its aims and data, there would be little anyone could do if you could assemble enough to bring a class action. They can always say they are still going to comply - there have been 'unforeseeable' delays
Well, that is how I, and a Brit lawyer relative I consulted and who gave it a quick appraisal, see it. But I accept that this may not be the view of others who have studied it in more depth and are acquainted with US financial securities law..
