InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 207
Posts 17234
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/06/2005

Re: samgj2006 post# 27027

Thursday, 09/27/2007 2:20:07 PM

Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:20:07 PM

Post# of 38879
duly noted and appreciated. my take is that its not a holding company because then why the name change. It implies company A is now going to be called Company B. Hence name change. If it were a holding company, there shouldnt be an official name change is what seems logical to me or imo



*all posts are strictly my opinion and thats that!*