InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 617
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2005

Re: None

Wednesday, 09/26/2007 9:30:30 PM

Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:30:30 PM

Post# of 326351
Clearly the power with this company lies with the 'single' source of funding and voting power. Both of which Cornell has. Chas Fritz leaving was obviously controlled and approved either directly or indirectly by this entity. All other theories may have some bearing on this reality, but the ultimate direction and approval of that direction comes from Cornell.

Cornell will not take this company in Bankruptcy anytime soon. They have too much invested and stand to make plenty more from directing the company. They have made tons from this company and stand to make much more keeping it alive. They will try to give it a chance to be successful, but in the end they make their money either way.

I think most agree with these comments. If you don't, what would you do if you were the single source of funding for a company that you had a substancial amount of money invested and had a major voting position. I think you would remove Chas and try to push things in the right direction, at least till you got your money out of the company.

So we wait to see what happens and when... knowing Cornell controls all... for now.

We do have some options that can change the scene. Band together, combine shares and buy more to hold a major voting block. Do that, sell or do as Streetstyz and in4it(you guys do and amazing job) do and promote the hound out of this thing and hope it helps.

Edster