InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 835
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/07/2006

Re: Micro Man post# 29696

Wednesday, 09/26/2007 3:02:41 PM

Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:02:41 PM

Post# of 87559
Micro, couldn't agree more, 7% is huge...investors will not be investing peanuts with 141...7% of large sums of money will add up to equal large sums of money.

it forces the question...if spooz gets 7% of the gain, and 141 gets some other % (lets say 3% just for kicks), that means investors are willing to sacrifice 10% of their gains to play with SWARM....does that seem kind of high to anyone else?...that is unless SWARM is that good!

thoughts?