SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[peeved]

allie...

thanks...

I just feel that direct ownership would be better for everyone...and insiders for SPZI are clearly insiders for 141 capital...calling all the shots--so everyone would gain. I feel that we invested in this company with spooztoolz, fractalz3, and swarm...that we should reap the benefits.

yet we would only get valuation from software sales. Swarm seems to be where there could be serious money...and just as a company might invest in MSFT, and buy and sell it...as shareholders we would have no control over the sale or purchasing of MSFT shares(in this case 141 capital). Furthermrore, I think we would benefit more from the presumed valuation (trading at 10 X revenue) vs mere asset addition of the 120 million shares...

others who buy 141 publicly traded shares will reap the direct benefits of swarm...likely with little investment like ours.

IE...if 141 announced a 1 billion dollar profit, shareholders of 141 would appreciate a marked valuation increase in their shares.

we would get indirect increase in valuation only by owning shares through the company...a liquid asset similar to owning cash.

there are plenty of companies out there with billions in cash, but trade at 1:1 share price to revenue ratio...because there is no direct growth valued into this asset...only liquid assets...

does that make sense to anyone but myself? it just seems that the quiet period was only for the benefit of 141 capital, which we won't own directly.

also, what would prevent the company from giving us shares of 141 capital??? and/or just let 141 own SWARM