InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 248
Posts 26046
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 06/14/2006

Re: None

Tuesday, 09/25/2007 12:56:34 PM

Tuesday, September 25, 2007 12:56:34 PM

Post# of 44855
Rick: While some may appreciate your response to one question we have been bleating on about, many others have not been addressed, upon further investigation I find the following not only offensive but very misleading.

""RSDS does not have the necessary financing in house and has decided not to pursue the debt financing necessary to acquire AUMN. "

uhhhh excuse me? rick?

you dont seriously think we are all stupid enough to drink that koolaid do you?

Just how much financing does it take to aquire something aquired by our ceo personally , using salary funds PRESUMABLY DERIVED FROM RSDS IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

HOW ABOUT YOU TRANSFER IT TO IT'S RIGHTFULL OWNER?

jUST HOW MUCH ARE YOU TRYING TO CHARGE RSDS FOR THIS ASSET ANYWAYS?

from the frying pan into the fire my dear boy?

This does NOT change the false and misleading pr element outlined to you previously, in fact I would suspect it exacerbates it!!!!

This is no better than a kid who won't play with the other kids, taking his bat and ball home with him so the other kids wont have anything to play with.

In my opinion, any and all shareholders should voice their opinions through the appropriate attorneys and authorities, until ALL OUTSTADING MATTERS ARE resolved, and for good reason as the latest regd filing appears to have our holdings in jeopardy OF FURTHER EQUITY FINANCING anyhow.

Such "FINANCING " as in the last 504, has hurt this stock's pps greatly, starting off here at this pps, does not look good enough a starting off point for another 504, especially if a reverse split accompanies it.

make your voices heard folks!

ALL IN MY HUMBLE OPINION...OF COURSE