InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252782
Next 10
Followers 56
Posts 1150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 52791

Monday, 09/24/2007 6:21:45 PM

Monday, September 24, 2007 6:21:45 PM

Post# of 252782
It’s a matter of degree, of course. Abraxane has a good enough label to pull it off

I'm certainly not trying to make a blanket statement disagreeing with you. In general, it's tough to compete in the managed care segment with a higher-priced product unless it is really better. The only caveat to that is the reimbursement status, which I think is more important than the label (presuming equivalence or better on the label). If the hospitals are reimbursed at a higher level, they'll go with the higher priced product. Maybe someone more familiar with the Abraxane reimbursement system can chime in and do a financial comparison between Abraxane and paclitaxel.

As far as Abraxane's label is concerned, they may well have got lucky. The control arm in the Sonus trial reinforces how unusually low the response rate was in the Abraxane pivotal. It's still a bit of a mystery (to me) why the FDA never blinked. The BCa docs we talked with were pretty uncomfortable. Abraxis (or whatever the hell their name is these days) has done a good job addressing that issue.

Unless otherwise indicated, this is the personal viewpoint of David Miller and not necessarily that of Biotech Stock Research, LLC

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.