InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 2042
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2006

Re: virginian post# 10088

Monday, 09/24/2007 2:47:55 PM

Monday, September 24, 2007 2:47:55 PM

Post# of 18151
virginian: The NJ court case was not an appeal by MJ or any other jackson - there was some peripheral involvement but MJ was not a plaintif, as far as I can tell. It was supposedly an attempt by another party to claim ownership, I believe due to some previous deal with the guy who sold to RA that didn't go through for some reason.

The problem is that it is impossible to find out anything about NJ cases online. There is no search engine to look for info on their cases. If you want info, you have to go to the court in question to request it, probably with some fee involved.

I've tried many times to find it. Right now, the only info available is what RA says (do you really believe the NJ court found the Nevada judge in contempt, as RA claimed awhile back?), and based on RA's lack of familiarity with truth, that means we have nothing to go on.

But we do have the very specific record of the Nevada court. And we can very reasonably assume that the NJ court cannot declare any Nevada laws, and the court procedures based on those laws, as null and void.

And there is no indication of any court orders from NJ in the Nevada records.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.