InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 2042
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2006

Re: virginian post# 10086

Monday, 09/24/2007 2:16:34 PM

Monday, September 24, 2007 2:16:34 PM

Post# of 18151
virginian: No, it did not include the disputed items. They had already been awarded to MJ by the Nevada state court.

NJ cannot overturn a legal result in another state, and there is no evidence that NJ attempted to do that (since every judge in NJ knows they can't, there won't be any such evidence).

UXPS lost in Nevada because it was fighting to overturn an agreement that it had signed and sworn was valid in the Nevada court, an agreement that settled the case in order to allow the auction to go forward. That was a legal, binding agreement entered in the court record.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.