InvestorsHub Logo

DTL

Followers 101
Posts 7530
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2005

DTL

Re: Kindergartenkid post# 31502

Sunday, 09/23/2007 7:51:57 PM

Sunday, September 23, 2007 7:51:57 PM

Post# of 34706
Kind, I apologize that you were in my crosshairs since we are indeed on the same side. I still feel many more posts can be removed making this board less cluttered with BS. Jen and others can go over to Myspace to post off topic if they are upset or bored with ETMO. I was asst moderator of another board and recently asked to be removed from that one as well. These boards have become popular weapons for shorters and pump and dumpers. PLNI had a real product, DD by many, acquired two companies, etc. There stock was shorted down from .019 to to .0003 and finally .0001 when they were forced into a CH11 reorg. Last week they were served a Wells notice by the SEC and will be in the greys shortly. All shareholders lose; the nakes short sellers win. I watched PLNI's Ihub board for two years and read all removed posts. This ETMO board has taken on a similar look just like PLNI's did. There are manipulators out there that have the funds and resources to go to any extent to put a company out of business. Part of their arsenal are the types of skinshredders, bashers and FUD slingers.
Any company that has phanthom shares against them; there will be an attempt to put them out of business eventually by those who shorted them since they never want to cover those phanthom shares or more importantly explain there whereabouts.
I have come to learn that a company with a real product in the pinks means nothing if that company is under attack. ETMO is under attack and I wonder if McCaa knows to what extent. Other the other hand if the company can survive, the trader waits for lows of four decimal places vs .03-.04, then much money can be made. Look at my post below from April and tell me I wasn't correct in waiting to buy ETMO again at .0002 if I buy again at all:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=18724989
When a company has a real product, real marketing, real customers, etc, then in my opinion the only risk we face are outside sources trying to take the CEO and company down.
In my opinion it is much more complex then just the market. These excuses of "it's the CEO's fault", "no verifiable information", "projecting false financials based on a hyperthetical preferred exchangesS" are the signs. Of course a CEO providing restricted/unrestricted shares for financing because his existing OS is worth zero since he has been shorted to death is nothing new. The problem perpetuates itself and the downward spiral has begun and my get worse than .0001 since CH7 or CH11 is not unthinkable.
Others here will have us believe otherwise i.e. a conspiracy theory, etc. A pinksheet stock with real products is no more risky than an AMEX or Nasdaq stock other than it is that much more manipulated by NSS, hedgefunds, piggybacked broker to broker, bashers, pump and dumpers, etc. If this stock can make it to a higher exchange before going under then it will be a winner. Good luck to you as well.