SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[Imperial Whazoo]

I'm glad you got the message early this AM. I was simply using your post as a thread of thought. It was my bad.

I'm in the Central time zone and, if I'm not overly tired, I try to check in for the first time about 5:30 AM. Truth is, as it gets towards Friday, I get to it later and later each day.

Say, I'm going to be out testing my theoretical system today. Working my ass off, actually.... busier than a one armed paper hanger. Folks will have to fend off the FUD-maestros on their own today.

Truthfully, allie and IT and wing and all the non-mods who are honest and hard working ordinary folk... Everyman, baby, Everyman.... this is a wonderful story stock. Say it out loud. Mouth the words. STORY STOCK.... STORY STOCK. Its not a fundalmental stock because it doesn't have financials yet, but past FUD-maestros have planted the seeds of doubt by starting to lay a foundation on the falacious notion that SPZI is a bad stock to hold because it is not repleat with sound financial undalmentals. IMHO, nothing could be less relavant at this point in the chart.

The Quarterlies that Paul et al filed did not make the company glisten like a financially sound jewel, and in most of pinkieland, they would not have filed & shown their dirty laundry. But they took the bit in their teeth and filed. If you want one more strut supporting the credibility of this company's management team, there you have it. They are not a scam, IMHO. 1st class ads, unnecessary financials, working demos.... one plus one ain't zero gang. If they had been like most pinkies, they would have tried to camo their vulnerabilities, if not hide them outright. But they did not. They filed what they had.

So, in addition to the attacks you can expect whose theme is that Paul is a liar, expect attacks whose theme is that some smart unknown poster is smarter than we are because Spooz is not financially sound and, as such, it is a really unwise investment. Deflect those too. Its my opinion, and everybody needs to make up their own minds, that anyone who insists that in pinkieland it makes sense to only invest if the company is financially sound is setting a hurdle at a point over which pinkies can not jump.

I don't know an analogy, but try this on for size: Suppose you went to the beach in Florida and you dipped a drinking glass in the water and pronounced, in a sage tone: "The only way I'll bother with this glass of water is if it isn't salty!!" Well, look, insisting a pinky be financially sound before you invest any $$ is a bit like that. Just about any pinkie you come across is not going to be a financial giant, and IMHO, the important fact is that this little pinkie voluntarily released such financials as it had. That is the telling detail folks IMHO, not some insurmountable hurdle that pinkies can't jump anyway. So watch for that mode of assault too. And if you feel weakened by the FUD-maestros, say the words aloud: STORY STOCK, letting them roll around on your tongue like a melting piece of sweet, hard candy.... STORY STOCK... STORY STOCK.

I gotta go. Gotta test my new "grey/black box" trading system today.

Lets hope for news. And for all the lurking FUD-maestros... if you succeed in stimulating a bear raid, don't think for a second that there aren't scads of folks camped out at every price point just waiting to scoop up the shares.

Imperial Whazoo