InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 366
Posts 10142
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/06/2005

Re: None

Wednesday, 09/19/2007 9:21:36 PM

Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:21:36 PM

Post# of 29782
A few of the negative posters on other boards don't seem to understand the difference between share issuance as part of the business plan and asset development as opposed to dilution and dumping that is for "consultants."

However, I do agree with the negative posters that when we don't have full transparency, full disclosure as to payments made for assets, then the company puts itself in a position such that assumptions are made that dilution is just dumping of shares and not legitimate fostering of the fiduciary interests of shareholders. It's not knowledge or a sure thing rather more "whistling" in the dark. Management can overcome these "whistles" but only with accurate information not hype and not dumping of shares.

Again, that's why it's so important for CEO's to under-promise and over-perform, not the other way around. Besides the fiduciary duties management owes to the owners of the business, i.e., the shareholders, it's in their own best interest as capital formation ultimately is easier and more rewarding to insiders when there is a tightly controlled capital structure and a share price which increases because of significant demand.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.