InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 336
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/17/2007

Re: None

Monday, 09/17/2007 4:19:37 PM

Monday, September 17, 2007 4:19:37 PM

Post# of 87793
Why isn't Paul keeping his word on the releases of SWARM results? At the meeting they said results would be published monthly. Well, we have only one published result. Even though the first set of numbers do look good, 12 trading days does not prove out the long term success rate for any trading strategy. If SWARM is doing to well, why not keeping releasing the results? I find it hard to believe that the recent quite period should have an effect on this previous promise. Maybe it will and I will understand in due time, but in the meantime I would like more info.

BTW, I have seen it posted here several times about SWARM and Fractalz. I don't believe these have anything to do with one another. The SWARM trading strategy is based on a statistical arbitrage. Fractalz is a predictive tool. I think it would help to get this straight.


---------------------------
July 19th 2007

Trading Days: 12

Number of Trades: 244

Average Trades per Day: 20.3



Number of Winners: 234

Number of Losers: 5

Number of Scratches*: 5



Winning Percentage: 95.9 %

Losing Percentage: 2.05 %

Scratch Percentage: 2.05%

Average Winning Trade: ** $30

Average Losing Trade: ** $16