So can you tell me if there is a REAL connection between Call Compliance and Verisign's expansion into India?
Let's assume I'm a rivet manufacturer who, consistently over a few years, derives 90% of my orders from company X. Company X announces it is expanding into a new foreign market with the expectations of increased business. Now, should we assume:
A) This is likely to be good for my business, as there will be an increase in demand for my product.
B) This is likely to be neutral for my business, as there is no certainty my rivets will be used in the foreign manufactured products.
C) This is likely to be catastrophic for my business, as newly formed relationships between Company X and lower cost manufacturers in the new country will lead to a switching of suppliers.
Got an answer? Then you presume a REAL connection between Call Compliance and Verisign's expansion to India.
On the one hand you are acting as if your primary concern is the pertinency of Verisign's expansion ("Who can say if it will mean a dime for COPI! I'll choose option B!") while scattered amidst your posts are insinuations that COPI's entire business model is in threat of collapse ("Option C! .0001 has an address and it's in India!").
Then you turn around and question "what? huh? India? Where's the connection?!" I don't much mind if you want to be bearish or skeptical, I think the facts of the company speak louder than your posts. But when you combine hypocrisy, logical inconsistency, and a "holier-than-thou" attitude; really it should be considered spam.
My 2 cents.
