InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 474
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/11/2007

Re: OG_Money post# 535

Friday, 09/14/2007 7:06:43 PM

Friday, September 14, 2007 7:06:43 PM

Post# of 5678
Your Post is misleading because it implies that it's possible there actually was an Expectorate backlog which delayed the La Planada sample results while Shawn has retracted that story and apologized for it.

So it's totally and utterly irrelevant that you and the company you work for would mislead potential customers just to make sure their money doesn't go elsewhere. Not everybody operates business that way.

"You wrote,

"I'm not attacking you but the problem i see with your story is this....."

That's misleading because there is no problem with my DD. And I take issue with you calling it a "story". It is not a story. I reported verifiable facts.

If you called Seacove IR, Shawn should have told you something like this,

"Gemini and Seacove IR are no longer alleging that the results have been delayed due to a backlog at Expectorate".

...but you're still making it seem like there's a chance that the assay results were delayed due to an Expectorate backlog.
And that's misleading since not only have Expectorate denied that but Shawn has also denied it.

Despite whatever possible scenarios might exist in some irrelevant hypothetical example you may concoct, the fact remains that in this case, the sample results ARE DELAYED FOR SOME OTHER REASON.

And nobody is saying anything about that unfortunately.




Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.