Yep- the article was misleading. stocklemon miscontrued the facts (they seem to be good at painting the picture they want folks to see), and Matt just followed on that, imo.
The follow on probably justified his point (even though it was buried in another article), in his mind. Shoddy reporting, imo.
But, that being said. The folks at stocklemon seem to have deep pockets, and coniving friends, so it may take a lot to get them to cover.
Today seems like a good start to get some of the shorts to consider it, eh?