InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2002

Re: jhalada post# 25231

Monday, 02/02/2004 6:55:39 PM

Monday, February 02, 2004 6:55:39 PM

Post# of 97831
First of all, what do you mean initially? Are you suggesting that the power numbers will go with Prescott will go down? Do you have a link, or are you just guessing, like you were guessing (wrong) about Prescott performance?


I'm guessing, that's all they've ever been. But I'm sure that you and your buddies think differently. I was waiting for some jer.... ummmm somebody, to mention it. I thought it would be Doug, I didn't see it through the ignore, but it's not too hard to guess that it's probably already happened. No matter, a reasonable facsimile has presented itself.

Yup, Yup I was wrong, didn't know what I was talking about. Didn't get it right at all. You'd think I would be better informed, being a(n)... (chose whichever) Intel employee..... Paid intel fudster...... Intel black shirt fudster, Intellibee, Bee, Paid Bee, or any of the other names I've been called here, wouldn't you? Gee, maybe I'm not the paid intel employee that everyone accuses me of, eh? Thanks for bringing it up. I'll be sure to point out in the future when you're wrong too....... Doug.......


Second of all, I would think that given Prescott's poor specs regarding power consumption, I think the OEMs will now give even more serious consideration to Opteron, since it not only runs cooler, it offers higher performance and 64 bit support.
Joe



Come back and talk to me when you speak for OEM's..... You don't.

Semi
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News