InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252358
Next 10
Followers 16
Posts 1506
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2005

Re: Preciouslife1 post# 52222

Wednesday, 09/12/2007 9:04:20 AM

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:04:20 AM

Post# of 252358
OT: more burning water

Preciouslife,
Rustum Roy is a legitimate scientist (emeritus prof at Penn State in Geochemistry, Solid State Chemistry, Materials Science). He's also a member of the National Academy of Engineering. He's no schmoe but I think he's pushing a little hard if those quotes are accurate. I'm very confident that he's aware of Ulrich Franck's work on supercritical water oxidation <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_water_oxidation> > (this is probably the only thing I've seen on this board that I actually know something about). The wikipedia link refs Franck's work but the link to the video didnt work for me. Franck was very fond of showing his "burning water" videos but he didnt have youtube. The supercritical water oxidation idea was adopted as a means of burning organic constituents in nuclear waste thereby reducing the volume and consequently the transport and storage costs. Using radiofrequencies to decompose water and burn organics in such systems MAY be a better approach but it will have problems if any metals are in the system. In the nuclear waste treatment application practicality and safety concerns trump energy efficiency. The idea of using radiofrequencies to generate hydrogen for vehicle fuels or as an energy storage medium (e.g. windmills power radiofreq generator --> H2) is somewhere between being naive and dishonest (depending on the knowledge level of the person doing the proposing). Not trying to be mean, just descriptive.
cheers,
Charlie

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.