InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.70
(
-0.11%
)
Bitcoin
65,070.75
(
-0.10%
)
Post# of 252254
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

OakesCS

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 16
Posts 1503
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2005

OakesCS

Re: Preciouslife1 post# 52220

Wednesday, 09/12/2007 8:08:33 AM

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 8:08:33 AM

Post# of 252254
OT Re: burning water

Preciouslife1,
If those quotes from Roy are accurate, I'm surprised because I would've expected less showmanship and more substance. I also suspect that any proposal by Roy to DOE will be an extension of Ulrich Franck's supercritical water oxidation work rather than as a means of generating hydrogen for fuel. The radio frequency generator adds an efficiency loss (direct electrolysis would be more efficient); however, it's conceivable that the process might have useful applications in areas such as waste treatment.
Charlie
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up