Followers | 1 |
Posts | 190 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 07/19/2006 |
Monday, September 10, 2007 3:49:42 PM
The one thing that is actually pissing me off is that I am sure Iconix did not just fork over $70 mil blindly. They had to have been provided audited financials among other information regarding DANS. It would appear to me that we should be treated just as well, if not better, than Iconix. As a shareholder/owner I should think I should have the same info as Iconix had before they shelled out the money. Have to remember....before they shelled out the money, they were just like anyone else walking the streets....absolutely no connection to Danskin at all !!!!
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM