ALL MY POSTS TO YOU, STOCKSTER HAVE BEEN IN RESPONSE TO YOUR UNCALLED FOR ATTACKS. YOU are the INSTIGATOR.
By your own words you have claimed to be out to cause trouble by attacking my posts. This obviously means deliberately twisting, and misinterpreting my posts, as in my references to LUMB.
Only a such a terminal mischief maker could possibly interpret my last few posts, in particular, supported Lumb as when you claim - 'I unbelievably support Mr Lumb.
In fact, I have researched the guy probably more than anyone here and disclosed on more than one occasion just what he is.
It is quite POSSIBLE that Lumb will try something on to rook his shareholders when the full change is completed. The man, from the articles I have posted,
is fully capable of anything and does not mind how small or how big are the ones he double crosses. He has a history of going back on his word as I HAVE POSTED.
I also said in the repost of mine you quoted:-
" how they could AVOID 'carrying' the shareholders forward into the new company, is beyond me AND WOULD BE GOOD GROUNDS FOR A CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT. "
Rememberm Stockster, you said we would NEVER become Fortress Financial.
It is well known by many that some posters post under more than one 'alias'. There is a noticeable similarity in your posts and exceo's directed at me- that is in tell tale syntax and other give aways, and the way you BOTH have the desire to twist what I post, and to assume that when I use the word possible, it means probable.
SURE THIS COULD BE PURE COINCIDENCE and that is why I merely INFERRED the POSSIBILITY.
As for the final outcome with this company, we can only wait and see. All cards are still on the table with this company.
I do not think we will have to wait long now.
