You and I must be living on a different planet. The UN clearly has a plan for global governance.
<<If this is not a call for an edifice of global law to be enforced by global government and financed by eventual global taxation, I cannot imagine what would count as such. The globalist bureaucrats prefer the term governance, of course. Governance involves partnerships. Partnerships are how the encirclement of controls envelops businesses and business organizations, hundreds of which have sent representatives to WSSD>>
When will you finally answer my question? Are you in favor of the USA retaining exclusive soveriegnty of it land and people?? Or do you favor the opposite: the breakdown of borders and national laws in favor of UN controlled internaltional law?? Or somewhere in between??
I favor the first of the options. I would also favor the USA withdraw from the United Nations and not heed any "International laws" that this cabal of dictators were to pass.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.