InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,751.07
(
0.90%
)
US TECH 100
19,476.00
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,352.75
(
0.81%
)
Brent Oil
77.97
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,992.47
(
-0.14%
)
Post# of 26833
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

uwlungman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 33
Posts 8334
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/04/2003

uwlungman

Re: None

Saturday, 09/08/2007 12:08:49 AM

Saturday, September 08, 2007 12:08:49 AM

Post# of 26833
How could regulators allow this?
That's the part I don't understand. A 10,000 to 1 r/s in Feb. 2007 followed by a 1:100 r/s 7 months later. The accumulative effect is the same as a 1:1,000,000 r/a (for every million shares held before the Feb. r/s you now hold 1 share--how can that be considered good for investors?). Something is very wrong here.

See what I've been up to:
http://uwlungman.page.tl/

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up