InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,168.00
(
0.52%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.28
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,221.94
(
0.33%
)
Post# of 82841
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

jking1999

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 2042
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2006

jking1999

Re: None

Tuesday, 09/04/2007 6:40:58 PM

Tuesday, September 04, 2007 6:40:58 PM

Post# of 82841
Let me see if I've got this straight - Cyberkey defaults on an 80K debt related to it's NASCAR publication advertisement, and we're all getting mired in a question is to why the company failed to honor its contract with SQUM?

The company has clearly defaulted on one major bill and people seem to be happy to deflect attention from that fact, as if arguing over why SQUM hasn't sued yet (at least in Federal court - PACER doesn't cover any state court actions), is the most important issue.

So, are you guys trying to claim the default that we know was due to non-payment is meaningless???????

Bizarre.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up