DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[stakddek]

Mingwan0: Agree but disagree. The current classifications are mandated, but the option was given for additional refinement. The pharma dong research "could include" DNAP ancestry results along with the self-reported race categories. Would be interesting to see the "error rate for self reported vs ancestry" in relation to drug effect. Given the cost of the pharma research, DNAP Ancestry test to each human test subject is negligible. I would, but then I was smart enough to invest here too!

Stakddek (who is only suggesting a rational (to him) footstep in the right direction by researchers.) More data is good. Obviously confusion in self reported race.