InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,270.66
(
-0.13%
)
US TECH 100
18,092.80
(
0.36%
)
Dow Jones
38,425.91
(
-0.67%
)
Brent Oil
78.46
(
-2.91%
)
Bitcoin
69,219.88
(
2.17%
)
Post# of 4953
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

kennypooh

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 68
Posts 9909
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2007

kennypooh

Re: Hardball88 post# 584

Sunday, 09/02/2007 12:22:15 PM

Sunday, September 02, 2007 12:22:15 PM

Post# of 4953
Hardball - You have missed a very important point of the GRC system. The system is close looped and the microwave generator is powered by consumable gasses created in the cracking process. It therefore does not require outside electricity or other fuels to be delivered to the site - there are no CO2 or CO emissions that need to be sequestered. This has a fantastic advantage when you compare it to other oil recovery prospects for remote locations that will require huge amounts of electrical power, water, fossil fuel or sequestering in the recovery process.

If you want a more detailed explanation of the technical aspects, I suggest you contact Hawk Hogan at GRC.

"Unless the microwave generator is powered by renewable energy, it does of course generate CO2 via fossil-fuel powered power plants that provide power to the microwave generator".

KP











When all is said and done it's what's done that counts, not what's said.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up