InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

Re: gail post# 44940

Saturday, 09/01/2007 3:04:34 PM

Saturday, September 01, 2007 3:04:34 PM

Post# of 56764
paim@ihub should try a little harder to remove totally off-topic, and useless non-responses. Which are most often supplied by the few, and deliberately self-uninformed, paim pumpers, who not only ignore the most important facts, they actually try to argue that the proven facts are wrong. And, those paim-pumpers have a cult-like faith, in only paim PR's, and their other pumper parrot friends and clones. And, they just keep giving excuses for paim not filing anything, or finding any gold, on time. After 5 years of losing 90% per year, an 'investment' of $1,000,000 in paim is 'worth' $10 , and going down to $1 soon.

This is a proven fact, and one of the few fact posters on RB, recently proved that each 1 of the 5,000 average paim outside shareholders, only has about 20,000 paim shares, worth about $40. I bet that they did not buy them for $30 per trade, plus $10 more in commissions. And, if they sell them all, for $40 , they will get a check for $30 , after commissions.

paim@ihub is usually factual, and on-topic. It would be a shame for it to be degraded to the uselessness of paim@rb and paim@sw. A good example was yesterday; both of those paim-pump-only trash bins had over 100 posts, that were 99% useless, except for laughs, and wonderment, about, 'How do those guys make up so many mega-excuses for paim' and 'How can those mega-buck-losing-longs keep buying that fluff'?

Averaging-down is profitable, for shorters, only.