InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 250
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2006

Re: Personalizit post# 128966

Saturday, 09/01/2007 11:27:31 AM

Saturday, September 01, 2007 11:27:31 AM

Post# of 326352
Personalizit, you asked...

"Why did they allow the sub fiasco (they were financing it)?"

Perhaps a better question is; Why have they (Cornell) continued to finance NEOM after the so-called sub fiasco?

Could it be the same reason that the other remaining shareholders are still here, and buying more cheap shares?

I believe so, it is a huge gamble.

If NEOM is successful we will all be rewarded, if they fail I know I won't be out 45 million dollars.

I think Cornell is crazier than we are. These guys are high stake gamblers, as long as the stakes continue to improve (.02 warrants) they are still in the game. JMHO