![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, September 01, 2007 11:27:31 AM
"Why did they allow the sub fiasco (they were financing it)?"
Perhaps a better question is; Why have they (Cornell) continued to finance NEOM after the so-called sub fiasco?
Could it be the same reason that the other remaining shareholders are still here, and buying more cheap shares?
I believe so, it is a huge gamble.
If NEOM is successful we will all be rewarded, if they fail I know I won't be out 45 million dollars.
I think Cornell is crazier than we are. These guys are high stake gamblers, as long as the stakes continue to improve (.02 warrants) they are still in the game. JMHO
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM