InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1028
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2002

Re: CombJelly post# 82490

Friday, 08/31/2007 4:41:32 PM

Friday, August 31, 2007 4:41:32 PM

Post# of 97762
What it fails to mention is that one of the cornerstones of AMD's 386 suit was the FTC found that Intel was guilty of "bundling" 286 and 386 processors.

You are way off base here.

The history lesson stretches the truth and offers many deceptions but it never asserts that bundling of the 286 was an issue in the Arbitration or elsewhere for a very good reason. It never happened.

There is an easy way to prove me wrong. Find a link to the FTC decision that found bundling of the 286 by Intel. It does not exist

The biggest laugher in the history lesson about AMD is that the 1995 Settlement Agreement gave "AMD a shared interest has in the x86 chip design". The only "shared interest" that AMD has is the obligation to pay a royalty on every AMD processor it sells.



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News