DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

DougS, Let's ask those who read the PR whether the phrase is ambiguous.

Board members.

How many of you interpreted the PR phrase;

"...but the increased number of markers allow for more sensitive and accurate determinations of low levels of admixture (such as that which may have been contributed by a single great grandparent). "

to mean that the increase in capability of Ancestry 2.5 over Ancestry 2.0 was it's ability to now determine the contribution of a single great grandparent?

Knowing as we all do, the impartiality of this board and it's members. (and the relative esteem in which DougS and I are held by those board members). I am sure that we can obtain a fair and representative sample.

How about it?