InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 41310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2006

Re: mikesharen post# 44567

Tuesday, 08/28/2007 2:15:59 PM

Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:15:59 PM

Post# of 56764
Why do you make stuff up, since I appear here at random. For those that bought .0001 pre post II buy back, they are flat, and those that bought at .0002 had lots of chances to break even, or make a profit.

your making up a story yourself .. your story applies only to people who got in early and bought new shares ... the people who had the 05% stock stolen from them most likely didn't buy or waited and bought much higher ...

so according to you it was a forced buy back at huge loss and a forced buy in in order to ' at a minimum to break even ....

Please explain how the people who lost 95% of their stock thru the' creative finance manure - have made a profit or broke even
with out sticking out their neck and buying more? ... have the people been paid for the 95 % theft of their stock?

Let’s stick to the facts..

I can hardly wait for this story....

Why are you afraid to disclose your relationship with PAIM or the insiders?