InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 94
Posts 34152
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/29/2000

Re: mikesharen post# 44567

Tuesday, 08/28/2007 11:35:45 AM

Tuesday, August 28, 2007 11:35:45 AM

Post# of 56764
Do your pearl math magic somewhere else. "Creative Finacing techniques" at work again? LOL typical pearlspeak. almost no one bought at .0001, and at .0002 they are out 65%.. shall I lay the simple math out again. what was your answer about your connection to PAIM or it's insiders, anyways

Lets forget the .0002 buys and concentrate on the few buys at
.0001.

Numbers on 1,000,000 shares

BUY side:
1,000,000 X .0001 = $100.00
Commission $10.00
total cost of 1,000,000 =
$110

SELL side:
950,000 X .00002 = $19.00
50,000 X VWAP of .0019 = $95.00
less commission of $10.00 =
$104.00

so far , if you bought at .0001 you have a gain of $4.00

Now we have to include the transfer agents cost of $25.00 and the brokers minimum reorganization cost of $10.00, and after all is said and done, with everything factored in. the net loss on 1,000,000 shares, pre buyback, is
+$4, -$25, -$10, for a total of a loss of $31.00.

thats at .0001. Most bought at .0002 or higher and they can add another $100.00 loss for every .0001 that they paid over the first .0001

Care to tell me how those few who bought at .0001 can be flat and how you can justify defending the huge percentage of losses for people who bought at .0002 or higher?

What connection to the company or its insiders do you imagine? Say I had any connection, why should I talk about that?

it figures, an insider pumping and feeding the koolaid drinkers "creative math" so they think they are making money

and those that bought at .0002 had lots of chances to break even

typical attitude from an insider, but totally incorrect. They never had a real chance to ever break even, because they had to buy higher than that fictitious .0001, but nice math.. again





PINKIE "INVESTOR'S" SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX