InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5216
Posts 24069
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: THE MATADOR post# 25058

Tuesday, 08/28/2007 4:00:46 AM

Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:00:46 AM

Post# of 38908
Overyy, I forgot one other thought…

To add to those other thoughts I posted to answer your question as to why so many posts on WNSH and WNSH alone.

Sometime, it’s just a feeling, but I do think that I should be careful in spreading myself to thin in talking about many stocks at one time. Some people do it well. I have had my moments for both doing it well and doing it not so well. Talking about a good many stocks seems to lead people to think more so that you are a pump and dumper because of the lack of time sharing thoughts too from one stock to another.

It’s better for me to be a “Swing Trader” with stocks because of my style of posting. I’ve learned to not upset so many people if things don’t turn out for the better when I’m swing trading versus day trading although I always reserve that right to do so if need be because of those two variables I talked about before; time and price.

Since well over 90% of the penny stocks fail, the odds are against you for talking about more stocks. The more stocks you talk about, the more potential bag holders you are making out of people. It saddens me to know that which is why I like my odds for isolating my time down to 1, 2, or 3 stocks or so to better try to find those select few success stocks. At least if I am wrong about a stock, there are potentially less people I would hurt.

Also, if you spend too much time researching many stocks in detail, there is a good chance that you can miss out on a gem right before your eyes from spreading yourself too thin. WNSH is a good example. I have discovered much about the potential of WNSH because of the time I have invested learning about WNSH. If much found would have been negative, then I would have moved on a long time ago. Hopefully this better answers your question.

v/r
Sterling