DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[stakddek]

Mingwan0 Did a very detailed commentary on the two major critics (well publicized critics). It is interesting that they are apparentley very aware of Doctor Shriver. Now given that the science that DNAP has is commercial, and it would be beneficial to thier work, perhaps they are a little hot under the academic collar at not being able to use all the inroads DNAP has been perfecting. Very frustrating for them I imagine.

Hopefully Doug who has E-mailed our reporter friend would forward Mingwan0's effort to Ms. ?????? (with Mingwan0's permission of course)in the hope that she may realize she has been "used". Perhaps she had a bias to begin with and sought and perceived the answers that reflected and reinforced that bias. I do not know if that was the case, but it's a thing we all have to watch out for in our daily lives. I find it a little comical that given the racial categories that they do use, and DNAP's ancestry being so more precise, we still are going to hung up on bias, because our own unique perception of "race" is being refined.

I seem to recall that a photodatabase is being created to aid law enforcement to better relate to how broad the categories are under the DNAP results. We can all well remember the "recall" on the first eyecolor testing to retake photos under more controlled circumstance. There maybe a few more of these "negative" press incidents until the process and the promise are fully understood.

PS: I don't think the brokers like it one you release news when they are at lunch! Oh well. I hope at least one of was finishing a softdrink and then sprayed a little beverage out of his nose. But that's just my sadistic aside.

Stakddek
(obligatory pump)
LET'S GO DNAP!