OT for others: MrD
". . . you yes voters . . ." Please post where I have ever stated that I was either in favor of the R/S or that I have/am going to vote yes. I believe I have stated more than once that I have not voted and do not plan to vote until the 10-Q comes out (unless it is late). That has not changed. Something isn't necessrily true just because you repeat it over and over. If you want others to buy in to what you keep saying over and over again, perhaps you need to be more credible. You have attacked my integrity. Can you back it up with truth, or will you dodge the issue as you have others before? If you have forgotten about the "before", it is posted below. It is your credibility at stake.
You have said "The nice thing about Democracy, voting, and accountability is that the people and voters will decide. It is after all, what much of the blood shed by countless hero's was in defence of and my way of honoring such sacrifice." You have stated "I fully stand by Democracy assuming it's a fair election . . .", yet you have also said "As to what will be done in the event of passage it's already in the works". This week you said "Legal battle? Bank on it". That is clearly a threat of legal action against the company if the proposal passes. Which statements do you stand by, democracy or not? It can't be both. It's your credibility.
If the majority of shareholders of record choose in a certified vote to vote in favor of the R/S proposal, will you respect the decision of the majority? Yes or No?
AI
