Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:56:44 PM
I initially thought that would include the 28.5k for the bond on the cache claims, however, looking at the check from the documents released by Berman. The checks are dated the 18th and and 24th of July. So this must be something else. I would expect some of this to be a down payment for the two geologists and could be covering some of their costs.
Also, this could include some of the equipment required for drilling however, that usually isn't seen on a P&L statement until it is invoiced to the contractor. This is how it is usually done in my experience in the oilpatch. The only exception to this rule is the status of the credit for the client requesting services. If they have dodgy credit, they would have to pay upfront. This could be the case here.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM