InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 305
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2007

Re: ciccio post# 22865

Tuesday, 08/07/2007 4:53:47 PM

Tuesday, August 07, 2007 4:53:47 PM

Post# of 38908
Good logic indeed, ciccio, but I must disagree with one and only one point. It seems that many feel that incorporating in Nevada is a good thing. It may be a good thing for those wishing to "skirt the regs", if you will, but it is not always good for shareholders.

This is not to say that all companies who are incorporated in Nevada are bad, but there is a greater chance for questionable behavior that may be detrimental to an investor. I am not going to get into specifics, although it would make a lovely discussion sometime, but suffice it to say that being a Nevada corporation does not hold the same weigh as, say, a Delaware corporation. So if you want this list to be the most influential one on the board, I would humbly suggest removing just that one item. Anyone who is or has been in business as a little guy may see that as a negative.

So you know, I am not flipping about as many are here. I have my small collection of shares and they ride free for however long this thing takes to either grow up or go down the crapper. I was lucky enough to get in at .0001 and .0002 and my investment is safely tucked into another high risk situation... ;)

I am hoping for the success of this company, as I really dig free money, and I would love to see us all retire early. Or at least earliER...


-Neb