I would like to point out, that most of the time, if not all, Keith's emails are in response to emails with questions he's received.
Typically, if one investor has questions, others will have the same question, so it seems reasonable, when appropriate, to grant permission to the recipient of the response to share the email if the recipient chooses to do so. This would be a more effective use of time rather than answer the same questions several times over.
But again, I've never seen an email where Keith has told someone to post an email. Only permission to do so.
My point being that not only do those shareholder hold some culpability in the fact those emails get shared, but it is also clear that Keith is not doing so as a replacement for formal PRs or filings.
It also means nobody has "superior knowledge". Some here have been talking about recipeints of email from Keith as if they are some sort of clique... and yet those very same people have their own email responses from Keith.
They get responses, because they email Keith and ask questions, and because Keith takes those questions and emails seriously.
I figure it's only a matter of time before someone starts criticizing Keith for puting his pants on one leg at a time, or for brushing his teeth with one hand instead of the other.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
