InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 4055
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/14/2006

Re: herkyhawk05 post# 34842

Saturday, 07/28/2007 2:25:13 PM

Saturday, July 28, 2007 2:25:13 PM

Post# of 162836
Possible answers:

To keep the PPS low for a genuine buy back?

At the same time with keeping the PPS low for buy back, appease the masses with some sort of update/PR?

Get some momentum in the buyer/distributors first before releasing the names so that investors and sabatogers will call and harass these buyers/distributor with all kinds of calls?

Investors disecting each and every PR and calling it "fluff"...

Corr does not want to let too much out of the bag too soon because of past experiences of failure?

Releasing information to an audience that has not fully packed the room? Ie, no volume…

Corr being stratic in that he will release meaty PRs when the audience is larger and listening?

Corr wants to do an interview on some radio type show to get the audience up (volume) so he can release these meaty PRs strtickly?

Too many to list…

One thing I know (or feel), when a corporation is very concerned about the PPS, I feel that business is not doing so good. When a corporation's concern for the PPS passes or no longer becomes a priority, that means business is doing good or very well… There will come a time where Corr wants the PPS to increase for the investors as well as filing his Form 144 to cash in on his personal achievement.

To me, I feel that Apple Rush and e-water are so much a success that the PPS is no longer a priority and they other things to take care of... They say "patience" is key... We will soon be rewarded for our patience...

imo