InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 435
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/16/2007

Re: jstick2000 post# 23331

Wednesday, 07/25/2007 12:44:28 AM

Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:44:28 AM

Post# of 49531
Lets look at this in a different angle. What did we get for our shares? 26.6mil shares restricted for 1 year= RML Assets and Products, licenses, patents, trademarks Etc. Value right now about 9 million based on share price of .32+- Real question: Did you think that was going to be free? What is the true net worth of RML?
Secondly, she plans on selling the remaining shares that are outstanding approx. 18 million for $1.00p/s. Real question should be where exactly does she plan to invest this money? Don't say "in RML", that is not exact. Bottom line is that $18 million are added to our assets? No loss of value.
Thirdly, Why would investors pay $18 mil for 1/3 +- of ownership in a company? Answer: It is worth much more than that and the potential for further growth ensures retained value. If I was examining the books I would not invest in a company 18 mil if it did not have a value exceeding 100 mil. I would also be looking at the companies business plan to make sure it is sound.
Finally, you talk about EPS and Market Cap as if it matters at this point. REM. O/S was reduced from 3 Bil down to 50Mil. We all had to know that she was going to look at capitalization to increase(We Hope) revenue. Whats really important is how she uses it.