InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252549
Next 10
Followers 24
Posts 1614
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: jshaffer85 post# 50179

Tuesday, 07/24/2007 10:21:54 PM

Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:21:54 PM

Post# of 252549
<<I believe the cutoff for interim survival was 6/15/06. At that point there were 112 patients left in active in the study. The breakdown was 90-22 which is much higher than the 2:1 randomization enrollment ratio.>>

I don't think those numbers work, as 463 deaths occurred by that date, and 950 patients enrolled in the trial. [Edit: unless you're saying those numbers are the # of patients still receiving satra or placebo]

I just checked the briefing docs, and I think the 700th death will depend on how back-end loaded the enrollment was. The last patient was enrolled in January 2006, and the median survival at the interim was about 61 weeks satra vs 57 weeks control. I think we'll see the 700th death this year, but perhaps GPCB will try a desperation move and tell the FDA the final unblinding will occur at a higher number of deaths, perhaps 800. Otherwise, I can't see it coming back stat sig at the 700th death. At 463 events, Cox p value was 0.296 and log rank 0.388, with the HR being 0.90.

It sounds like 12-month followup after the 700th death is merely a different desperation method of trying to improve the final p value, instead of just increasing the event trigger to 800 or more.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.