InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252588
Next 10
Followers 36
Posts 3185
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/18/2003

Re: Gametheory101 post# 50169

Tuesday, 07/24/2007 7:26:46 PM

Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:26:46 PM

Post# of 252588
I believe we all thought that with a large trial and strong stat sig, albeit of a result with precious little clinical value, this would be a shoo-in.

Strong statistical significance when you measure pain a certain way. from page 22 of the briefing doc you can't convince me that the trial participants on drug had less pain.


The clear message from the Pazdur/Hussain/Sher/Flemming contingent in power at the FDA is they want survival data for cancer drugs.

when all is said and done this drug will not have a survival benefit. if you don't increase survival or reduce pain what is the drug good for.

The irony is Provenge had solid survival data, yet they wanted a larger trial that was pre-specified to be "sure", or, they wanted 9902B. Why would they change their stripes for GPCB?

Intermune's actimune also had a survival benefit until they ran another trial with survival as the pre-defined endpoint. Guess what, more people died on the drug

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.