Nice video except for a couple of things. Comparing the two fires, one in Madrid and the World Trade centers is like comparing apple to oranges. Different designs and different causes. The building in Spain, let me see if I remember, oh yeah, I was there for that one, was not hit by a plane. it did not have jet fuel burning. It did not have the fire proofing blown off if it. Two very different cases.
Second, the dust shooting out of the windows is actually correctly identified when it said it was caused by extremely high pressure. Hmmmm, maybe a compression wave would caused that. That would make more sense because you would have seen a more uniform pattern of explosive charges.
Third, when a building is demolished/imploded, it happens from the ground up and is usually proceeded by several second of explosives going off internally. Have you ever seen a building being imploded? Look it up on You Tube as i am sure there are several examples. Also, when professional demolitions occur for very complex buildings, much like the WTC towers, they are prepared for well over a month by gutting the inside and weakening the structure significantly.
Plus there was no description of the physics involved other than a boat load of conjecture regarding building collapse times.
Anyway, you are obviously entitled to your opinion based on the accounts of skeptics, however, I will go with what makes the most common sense.
Remember, you are accusing an administration of planning something so sophisticated as what you believe and we can't even plan an effective campaign in iraq or secure our borders. Seems like a bit of a stretch to me. Bush and Co would have to be planning this from the moment they checked into 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Anyway, I wish you well in you endeavor to crack this "mystery"
-faz
"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." - John Galt
AI
