InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 864
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/10/2003

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/18/2007 10:12:38 PM

Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:12:38 PM

Post# of 15221
copied from ragingbull
By: thomasranchita
18 Jul 2007, 09:21 PM EDT
Msg. 74135 of 74135
Jump to msg. #
I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO POST A MESSAGE FOR A FEW DAYS. I CONTACTED MR.PETERS OF PLFM. AND ASKED HIM IF THE COMPANY EVER OFFERED THEIR SYSTEM TO A LARGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LIKE VERIZON. THIS IS THE REPLY I RECEIVED ON 7/11/07

Even the cost of a mobile system at $15.5 million is more than a supplier (such as Verizon) wants to spend to extend their network. But in cases where the network is down, such as in the aftermath of a Hurricane Katrina event, the federal govt has an incentive to quickly restore EMERGENCY communications, and that is where our current market lies for the RECOM-911 System. Anything that flies over 200 feet above ground level comes under the jurisdiction of the FAA, so a Verizon would have to apply for and be granted a “no-fly zone” every time they move the system. Conversely, the emergency response forces are the govt, and are much more capable of being granted an emergency “no-fly zone” by the FAA in the aftermath of a disaster.

It is important to point out that our new Strategic Partner is representing BOTH the RECOM-911 System and the ROSETTA-911 System to their clients and govt contacts, and their sales force is quite excited to represent the biggest ticket item they’ve ever had to offer.