InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 248
Posts 26046
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 06/14/2006

Re: TekNuLoof post# 24870

Wednesday, 07/18/2007 5:36:51 PM

Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:36:51 PM

Post# of 44858
No i do believe you are misconstruing a few things here.

To clarify, some time ago it was brought to the board that state officials had positively asserted the fact that water and the removal thereof was an issue in granting permits necessary for mining the rage claims. In short it would cause lenghty delays and red tape for permits, to be granted.

Some folks on the board contacted berman for further clarifiaction, and basically were told that this was incorrect.

It was then insinuated per berman, as per makesumgravy that this was fraudulent.

John's document from susan white clearly refutes both of those theories and places questions on the statements by berman on both matters. More to the point it raises the fact that dewatering was and possibly still is an issue, at least it was in so far as much as it caused rsds to amend their noi.

Time to stop blasting the messenger here, john explained why he hesitated to post, giving berman a chance to come clean.

Time to put the questions to your ceo man, clearly he is the one needs to answer some questoins at this point.

By the way folks as I posted in earlier DD, this dewatering issue can still rear it's head come time to mine, and even is still possible prior to drilling.