chigg: all due respect to the masses at large, ...
~~~~"Seems like you are having a moment slinging your spit and having a tantrum."~~~~
Agree with his diatribe or not, that is certainly NOT what those three posts did. It’s far more likely it’s what you are doing in your retort. See this is the problem with these boards: the simplest common denominator is the dominator and any actual discussion is muffled by ordinary smash-mouth discourse. Now anybody who’s been round these parts long enough knows that the frog takes pleasure in standing at the plate and fielding pitches…while tossing a bit of his own junk from the mound from time-to-time himself, but whether or not his posting history is liken to anybody else’s (as with a paid basher scenario) is still unproven. In my opinion, he is a renegade individualist from the earliest proponents of this issue. & that is his right.
I wouldn’t piss on frog if he were on fire, unless he was in my boat or I was in his, but those three posts were coherent, well dumbed-down for the masses ~~ even I could grasp the whole of it, and clearly making a point of material logic over mind's eye. The only viable responses to those three posts would best come in equally coherent manifestations of erudite contrary thinking based on available historical documentation from the science and the company prospectus. Really, man, think about it: In those three posts, froggy-froggy-froggy has opened up a double door to a grand ballroom of point-counterpoint argument. You have every opportunity to present your analysis while making a mockery of his, if it’s applicable. Those who would have the cajones need only step up to the plate and swing away. For sake of argument, I’m not the guy to attempt it; the content is out of my league, I’ve been a hopeful idiot, but anybody who wants to sling poop should first ask themselves this: What is my aim? Am I here to have a say for sake of merely spewing rash-etudes and crude-illations in a typically rash & crude forum? Or am I here to discuss my investment in a manor to which best suits my projected ends?
Whether or not DNAG remains on to something viable is yours to reveal (if you are so inclined) & dnaPrint’s responsibility to prove in the form of meaningful stock returns in the nearest possible future; given all that needs to be gotten done before any ship may sail. It is really that simple, isn’t it?
Frog actually has ~~ just take a moment and consider it to your own advantage ~~ opened up a viable forum for discussion wherein YOU can take him down a peg or two. Very few good discussions have actually existed on these P&D forums where DNAG is concerned. It wouldn’t suck, would it? Finally, an antagonist to the company processes has begun to pass the talking feather: & yet, I see not one taker. If I were savvy enough, I would jump on it. However, I am just a poet and a mediocre investor down on his luck with regards to DNAG. I held though, so what’s done is done. Nobody here wants DNAPRINT GENOMICS to succeed in creating revenues more than I do. Who here, besides the one-liner-maligners with a keyboard and far too much time on their hands, has the gravy to go-one-on one with the biggest pain in the azz opponent to DNAG past & current events…to ever hop from one lilly pad to the next? If no one, then what’s EVER been the point?
Kind Regards,
AI
